1: “Greece needs a simple tax system” – How is the current
system failing? Is it predominantly an issue of changing the rates or one of
compliance?
One of Greece’s favorite pastimes is inventing ways for tax
avoidance. Why is it that Greeks are so repelled by the fair contribution of
proportionate taxation attributable to their economic activity? I will list a
number of the more important reasons for brevity’s sake which will provide a
compelling explanation to this phenomenon:
1-
The perception, borne out by reality, that
government is corrupt and most of the taxes collected will not go towards a
socially responsible cause but to serve the interests of politicians and the
rest of the public bureaucracy.
2-
The tax system has over the years been
constructed in such an unprofessional and short sighted fashion that it has
become a maze, as each year’s tax brigade passes bills to extinguish each specific
year’s fires without an overall strategy geared to predetermined objectives.
This has meant that investors, corporates, households are in a constant state
of uncertainty as the tax system is altered to capture some inadvertent
shortfall. In such an environment tax payers are always on the defensive in
anticipation of the unexpected.
3-
The system in its current form is incentivized
in favor of tax avoidance. On a household level it’s based on the method of
inferred income as a means of assessing tax liability over and above annually declared income What this effectively
means is that the government taxes households on the aggregate of their
lifestyle activities and holdings if this is above the earned declared income.
If this sounds more complicated its because it is. If I live in an apartment of
a certain size I will be taxed on the inferred income for choosing to live in
that apartment irrespective of whether I
earn this income or not. The same principle applies to owning a car, having a
cleaning lady in your household employ, having a pool in your house (this may be
justified but is this a way to run the finances of a country?) or would you
believe paying for a mortgage and this system works progressively to higher
incomes dependent on the degree of your aggregated lavish lifestyle; the list
goes on. It is one way you may say of capturing the tax evaders but it’s not an
equitable system, it is an indirect blackmail on the tax payer and of course
assumes that Greek society in its entirety is crooked thus driving it to
self-fulfillment. Let me expand a little on the mortgage payment so that you
can get a perspective of how unjust this is. Assuming you have decided to
invest your hard earned savings by buying a property in Greece and that you
would need a mortgage for that purpose. Not only can’t you not offset your interest
expense against your income (but to a very small %tge, 10% if it’s your first
property) but the total monthly mortgage payment is considered inferred income.
In other words the tax authorities assume that if you have money to pay for
this mortgage you must also have the commensurate income and you will be taxed
on it. Imagine now that you lose your job and you have no means of paying for
your mortgage (This is what has been happening in the private sector in Greece.
Close to one million jobs have been lost) not only are you in a dire economic
situation but you are required to pay income tax on non-existent income. To
make a long story shorter if ever the word labyrinth was a Greek invention it
applies aptly to the current Greek tax system
4-
Finally let me just touch upon the property
market as its downturn has contributed to a large extent to the Greek economic
depression.
Because tax authorities have been
unable and unwilling to find a system that would work efficiently they decided
to overtax the property market to such an extent as to literally kill the
market and anything associated with it. Purchase tax for a property built prior
to 2006 together with ancillary costs, lawyers’, notary’s fees etc. amounts to
a range between 11-12% of the contract price. For properties built after 2006
the tax paid is VAT currently at 23% plus fees. If you own a property you pay
an annual wealth tax on the objective
value of your property close to 1per mille. Moreover, the one off payment or
levy payable on Electricity bills which is now expected to remain for a second
year is an additional amount ranging, depending on location and thus value of
the property, between 3-16 euros a square meter. The system therefore penalizes
the prudent saver who may also be unemployed and unable to pay these sums.
Finally, rental income is taxed at the 45% level without any allowance for
offsetable expenses.
All this taxation has caused a
collapse in demand for properties and has brought one of the largest engines of
growth in Greece to a standstill. It has also been suicidal for the government
as it has killed off the value of a market it relies upon to sell some of its
prized property possessions.
For argument’s sake let me suggest
a solution. A low enough tax rate (say a
maximum of 5%) on property, fixed for a duration of at least 15 years secured
by constitutional law will for example provide enough incentive to declare the
true value of property transactions without recourse to Objective values ( the
Official values set by the government on which all transactions are based and
taxed. Initially set at low levels but now surpass market values). This will
revitalize the property market, substantially increase private investment in
property and related sectors, reduce unwarranted corrupt tax bureaucracy and
thus the deficit. A growth oriented policy made in Greece.
2: “Greece needs to promote foreign direct investment” – At
a time when the economy is contracting sharply, how can the country hope to
attract international capital? Would it involve redefining the timeframe of the
troika’s austerity demands?
Firstly let me tackle both your questions and then expand on
my suggestion. Reversing the economy’s decline should be part of the overall
strategy of this government. I do not aspire to the notion that there cannot be
any foreign direct investment because the economy is contracting. On the
contrary it is in times of austerity that values decline and investors are able
to pick up assets attractively, provided of course the government undertakes
policy measures which over time create the basis for sustainable growth. The
argument so often used by most opposition parties that this would be a fire
sale of government assets is fallible as those processes can easily incorporate
participation on the upside earnings and or sale price that may result from the
running of the privatized company. It is true to say furthermore, that there is
active, keen interest in the candidate companies for privatization even in
today’s economic climate of profound uncertainty.
There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that the world’s best
second home property locations can be found in Greece. Whether those are on
popular island retreats or on forgotten coves amidst the pines of the
Peloponnese or some other magical exploit, Greece’s wealth is waiting to be
shared.
If the government therefore,
embarks on a privatization program with enough incentives to attract both
foreign direct investment but also capital for private investment this
contraction can quickly swing to growth.
The Troika asks for a reduction in the deficit to manageable
levels. What does this mean? It means that this government must immediately cut
government spending to bring about such a result. This may imply increased
redundancies in state run companies something which should have been carried
out from the very beginning. Instead the government at the time, to protect the
public sector and its votes, chose to raise taxes across the board, cut
salaries and pensions thereby feeding austerity without solving the underlying
problem. Greece turned a deficit into an austerity problem by refusing to cut government
fat and I may add is even today cornering itself by vociferously protecting the
employment of public sector employees at the expense of the battle worn private
sector employee. Not only is this bad economics but more importantly unethical.
On the merits of privatizations I think my argument is
self-evident but if you so wish I can expand on a separate blog.
Summarizing though privatizations:
a-
Lower government deficit and thus market
interest rates and increase market confidence.
b-
Inject much wanted liquidity into the system.
c-
Increase tax receipts as companies are run more
efficiently and
d-
Reduce embedded corrupt practices probably the
biggest obstacle to unleashing private initiative in Greece.
3: “Greece has to
reduce or shut down redundant public companies” – What effect would this have
on unemployment? Public sector reform may be necessary but without a growing
private sector could it simply compound the problem?
In Greece there is an enormous amount of corruption stemming
from the inability to implement any of the laws that have been legislated by
parliament. This is a matter to discuss in my next assertion and Greece’s most
pressing problem but what is relevant under this section is that public
companies and or institutions are the breeding ground for such corruption.
Whether those are Hospitals, Utilities, Universities, Planning authorities, Tax
offices, Municipalities, take your pick. The explanation for this is clear
without recourse to regulation or punishment these masterful conjurers manage
their powerful positions by enriching themselves and their families. A recent
revelation of a court employee with 9 million euros on deposit and many
properties in her name resulted in her being dismissed from her position. There
has so far been no announcement for seizure of her assets or an inquiry into
the matter. If this is the response to the enrichment of a junior court
employee the mind boggles on the magnitude and response to senior level employees.
My point therefore is that the public sector is colluding to
resist shrinkage for obvious reasons and many of these bodies provide nothing
tangible, if anything many of them produce headwinds on the ever declining and
value creating private sector. Ask any Greek citizen about his day to day
engagement with a public employee. This
is particularly true for entities set up for the sole purpose of securing the
dedicated votes of their faithful flock.
I submit therefore that contrary to Keynesian dogma, in
Greece’s case the Public Sector is one of the roots of Greece’s problem and
must be contained to provide room for more productive forces to take hold and
more importantly to cut the deficit.
With this said there are Public companies which for strategic
and other purposes must remain public and there are public employees who have
been doing an admirably efficient job unscathed by the tempting voices of the
sirens. These people must be rewarded adequately commensurate with their public
service.
In answer to your question therefore, we have so far seen an
increase in private sector unemployment, now running close to 1 million,
because successive Greek governments demanded, for reasons outlined above, the preservation
of the employment of the public sector. There will clearly be an increase in
unemployment with the reduction in public employment but if incentives for
private investment are introduced on a permanent basis and the government
embarks in an extroversion trip this will rapidly be erased by the dynamics of
private enterprise.
Greece’s legal system must be simplified, protected and
enforced” – Do you have any particular areas in mind that require
simplification? Are there any particular groups who have avoided scrutiny by
the legal system to date?
I do not profess to know the workings of Greece’s legal system;
all I know is that it reflects the epitome of bureaucratic practices under one
roof. From the time it takes for cases to be heard in court or rescheduled, to
the processes involved all require patience and perseverance by all involved.
I believe Greece’s problems stem from the unwillingness by
the system to enforce the law and when it does it is so cumbersome and
longwinded that the end result does not necessarily justify the effort. For
democracy to work efficiently and effectively the justice system must endorse
and uphold its values. It is the knowledge that corruption will remain
unpunished which breeds corruption in every level of everyday living.
Greece needs to understand its problems, a made in Greece unsustainable deficit which was condoned long enough to nurture a second monster in the way of its debt. Both of these are clearly successive Greek government creations being blessed of course by the easy money of the EU.
As masters of our own predicament and beneficiaries of unprecedented debt forgiveness, we need to ask ourselves what is the road to restoration, embracing EZ membership in a world economic environment hostile to new initiatives.
1- Greece needs a simple tax system which punishes tax avoidance and evasion not based on Objective (miscued) values or Inferred income which are both subject to increased bureaucracy and distortions. A system conducive to the promotion of private investment.
2- Greece needs to become extraverted to promote foreign direct investment because it’s highly expansionary and deficit reducing particularly through the process of privatizations. To claim this would be a fire sale of Greek government assets is a complete misrepresentation of facts playing to the aspirations of political demagoguery and private interests.
3- Greece has to reduce and shut down redundant public companies created for no other purpose but to gain politicaly leveraged votes, a major misallocation of scarce resources.
4- Above all Greece’s legal system must be simplified protected and enforced in every aspect of everyday life. The notion that illegal behavior remains unpunished is the incubator of corruption.First & foremost though Greek politicians need to take this initiative by abolishing immunity, as the minutest symbolism of the sacrifices demanded of its people.
Greece can. Will it?